A randomized retrospective clinical study on the choice between endodontic surgery and immediate implantation

Garegin Movsesyan; Edita Margaryan; Marianna Arakelyan; Mikhail Stepanov

doi:10.2478/fzm-2022-0012

A randomized retrospective clinical study on the choice between endodontic surgery and immediate implantation

doi: 10.2478/fzm-2022-0012

1.
Training and Clinical Center?FODERIS?, Moscow 121467, Russia
2.
Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia
3.
Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia
4.
Department of Surgical Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov Institute of Dentistry, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia

More Information

Corresponding author: Edita Margaryan, E-mail: edita@mail.ru

摘要

Abstract: Background Periapical endodontic surgery (PES) for root amputation and tooth replacement by immediate implant placement are two possible treatment options for bone lesions in the root apex of a tooth that has previously undergone endodontic treatment. Treatment methods are performed when the effectiveness of orthograde canal revision is questionable or when such treatment cannot be performed. The effectiveness of these methods varies from study to study. Objective clinical evaluation of the efficacy of periapical endodontic surgery for root amputation and immediate implant placement with simultaneous tooth extraction in the proximate and long-term treatment. Materials and methods The study included 183 patients between the ages of 24 and 63. Patients were divided into 2 groups; group Ⅰ - endodontic surgery was performed to resect the apex of the tooth root (108 patients) and group Ⅱ - an operation to install an implant with simultaneous tooth extraction (75 patients). In group Ⅰ, in 36 cases, PES was performed in the area of the first molars and premolars, and 72 cases in the area of incisors and canines. In group Ⅱ, 75 patients received 231 implants. Results In all 108 patients of group Ⅰ in the postoperative period and within 1 month, the wounds healed without complications. In none of the 36 operated premolars and molars, there was no definitive elimination of the radiographic bone loss (Rude grade 2 and 3) after 12 months. In the area of incisors and canines, complete healing was observed only in 37.5% of cases (Ⅰ class according to Rud). In group Ⅱ, out of 184 implants installed immediately after tooth extraction, one was removed one month after implantation. In other cases, all implants were successfully integrated with the subsequent fabrication of prosthetic construction. Conclusion The complex "implant (installed in the socket of the tooth immediately after its removal) - bone - soft tissues - prosthetic construction" is stable over time in terms of functional and aesthetic parameters, preservation of bone tissue, and mucous membrane.
- periapical pathological lesion /
- immediate implantation /
- delayed implantation /
- apicoectomy /
- endodontic surgery

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	Tang Y, Lee X T, Yin S H. Results of retrograde filling of the apical part of the root canal with MTA. Systematized overview. Quintessence, Russian edition, 2010; 3: 239-250.
[2]	Frank A L, Glick D H, Patterson S S, et al. Long-term evaluation of surgically placed amalgam fillings. J Endod, 1992; 18: 391-398. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81226-4
[3]	Rud J, Andreasen J O, Jensen J E. A follow-up study of 1000 cases treated by endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Surg, 1972; 1: 215-228. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(72)80014-0
[4]	Baker T, Flemming T. The choice between implant placement and tooth preservation in terms of periodontal health. Perio iQ, 2007; 10: 42-52.
[5]	Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B, et al. A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI dental implants and Branemark system implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2004; 6(3): 130-141. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00213.x
[6]	Ferrara A, Galli C, Mauro G, et al. Immediate temporary prosthesis and immediate implantation to replace single upper teeth. Perio iQ, 2007; 11: 55-62.
[7]	Bunev A A, Muraev A A, Gazhva Yu V, et al. The results of immediate post-extraction implant placement with immediate loading procedure and the substantiale of its protocol by mathematical modeling. J Sci Articles Health and Edu in 21st Century, 2018; 9(20): 62-69.
[8]	Put V A, Haralarmpos M, Ilichev E A. Immediate implant placement and intraoperative direct prosthetics are the key success factors in dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient, 2019; 3(67): 32-37.
[9]	Byking W. Advice and secrets from the practical doctor. Immediate implantation. Perio iQ, 2007; 10: 85-92.
[10]	Carlsson G, Persson G. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing of dentures. Odontol Rev, 1967; 18: 27-54.
[11]	Xu B B, Hafizova F A, Mirgazizov R M. Device for the atraumatic removal of teeth for direct implantation. Russian Journal of Dental Implantology 2007/2008.1/4(Ⅱ)(17/20): 124-125.
[12]	Behneke A, Behneke N, D'Hoedt B. A 5-year longitudinal study of the clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in the treatment of mandibular edentulism. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants, 2002; 17(6): 799-810.
[13]	Losev F F, Bondarenko N A, Kirsanov A V. Instantaneous implantation with tooth removal, reduction of risk of atrophy of alveolar bone and mucous membrane. Russian Journal of Dental Implantology, 2010; 1(21): 31-35.
[14]	Musienko A I, Nesterova K I. Immediate implantation in a patient with chronic generalized periodontitis and apical granuloma. Parodontology, 2019; 2(24): 145-149.
[15]	Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard J P, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. part i: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1997; 8(3): 161-172. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
[16]	Buser D, Weber H P, Lang N P. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1990; 1(1): 33-40. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
[17]	Davidyan A L. Immediate implantation. experience of application and comparative effectiveness. Periodontology, 2006; 1(38): 62-66.